When Sanctuary equals shooting self in the foot – Protecting undocumented juvenile “crack dealers”

// July 1st, 2008 // Human Rights, Immigration

Disclaimer – I LOVE SAN FRANCISCO

The experiment was a noble one — Instead of complying with federal immigration law, city officials in San Francisco would take on the cost of flying juveniles convicted of drug crimes to their countries. That would prevent federal deportation and criminal proceedings against these youth, giving them a clean slate and fresh start.

I have to give it up for San Francisco. It was a truly progressive, forward-thinking idea until 8 Honduran youth escaped from the Southern California group homes where they were being housed prior to their flights back to Honduras. Now, the city is the laughing stock of the country.

These are the kind of stories that annoy even progressive-minded Americans. Local San Franciscans are angry. Why are their tax dollars being used to fly these youth to their countries when they can be simply handed over to the federal government to prosecute? Well, the city has a sanctuary policy of not complying with federal immigration laws and harboring undocumented residents. Also, law enforcement in San Francisco and Berkeley are generally much more relaxed about drug laws than other places in the country. As a result, we start abusing our SANCTUARY CITY policy to harbor and protect juvenile crack cocaine dealers.

Yes, the alternative is worse from a human rights point of view–we are talking about juveniles after all who probably have no other means of subsistence. The problem is that the battle lines have been drawn and there is no middle ground in our restrictive immigration system. So when stories like these break out, it is tough to defend the “undocumented immigrant” or sanctuary city policies since we are no longer talking about undocumented students, hard-working immigrants who stay out of trouble, or migrant women slaving away in used-clothing factories (re:Houston).

Given by the comments at the SF Chronicle, an overwhelming majority of San Franciscans think the city is absolutely absurd for this sort of behavior. This one is actually in-line with how the city could be more forward-thinking:

Dear Gavin – Please just release them prior to booking, and save us some money. Love, the Taxpayers

Another way of looking at it: Since the 8 Honduran teens escaped the homes, they are now saving taxpayers money by being “productive members of society.”

The problem is not with small-time drug-dealers on the streets; it is with the bigger administration of criminalizing drug use and not attacking the source of the problem. By the same token, the problem does not lie with undocumented juvenile drug offenders, but a neo-liberal globalization that has created dire-enough conditions to perpetuate poverty, crime, hopelessness in many undeveloped and developing regions of the world.

I cannot sit and defend the behavior of the Honduran youth or city officials by providing rationales or excuses. Yet, this does not mean I support federal immigration or drug laws.

What I can do is grin at the goofy policies of San Francisco city officials, some of which have led to great social movements and progress for this state and country.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to “When Sanctuary equals shooting self in the foot – Protecting undocumented juvenile “crack dealers””

  1. The truth is, these kids are fleeing poverty, child abuse and/or neglect and hopelessness. It is unfair to make them the scapegoats for this mini-scandal or to sacrifice their well-being for Gavin Newsom’s political ambitions. Gavin, where are your principles??

    Many of these kids’ trips to the Bay Area are financed by the larger drug dealers who then expect the kids to pay back by selling drugs. They also make drugs available to the kids, which helps to make them even more beholden to the dealers. These kids are first victims of poverty and child abuse; then they become victims of the real drug dealers who send them out to sell. Now, they are victims of Gavin Newsom, who is not holding true to his principles in San Francisco as a Sanctuary City.

    These kids are children, and sending them back deported is sentencing them to incarceration first by the U.S. immigration system and possibly afterwards by the Honduran system, which is very harsh. Gavin Newsom should be ashamed of himself. There is no lobby to defend the Honduran kids who come here and to help publicize their situation(s), such as exists in Florida among the Cuban community. I also fault the SF Chronicle for describing these kids as “dealers” when the real dealers appear to go free (hint: many of the them are in Oakland).

  2. admin says:

    Agree with your points.

    I wouldn’t necessarily go after Gavin — he did something that is still considered politically unacceptable in most of this country. Most people simply cannot see that these juveniles are indeed, victims of their circumstances. Sending them back home without getting the feds. involved seemed like the lesser of two evils.

    But of course we have more than two choices, always.

Leave a Reply

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree