<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Muslims Not What You Think &#8211; Breaking from Stereotypes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prernalal.com/2008/08/american-muslims-not-what-you-think-breaking-from-stereotypes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prernalal.com/2008/08/american-muslims-not-what-you-think-breaking-from-stereotypes/</link>
	<description>No Borders and Binaries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:50:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prerna</title>
		<link>http://prernalal.com/2008/08/american-muslims-not-what-you-think-breaking-from-stereotypes/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Prerna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prernalal.com/?p=398#comment-907</guid>
		<description>1. You completely missed the point of the article -- it speaks about the DIVERSITY of Muslims. Obviously, not all Muslims abide by &quot;Sharia law&quot; and I doubt a majority of U.S. Muslims do.
2. I am not Muslim so keep your ad-homs to yourself.
3. That has absolutely nothing to do with the context of the article which is on American Muslims.
4. If people were &#039;harmful&#039; naturally by being associated with a religion, it would be &#039;Christians&#039; that should be &#039;hunted down&#039; for the Crusades and for keeping the world in the &#039;Dark Ages&#039; for centuries.
5. You are mixing burdens and more than that, assuming that if a superior power structure rules for/against something, than it must hold true, which is absolutely not true. 
6. There is no space for bigotry on the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. You completely missed the point of the article &#8212; it speaks about the DIVERSITY of Muslims. Obviously, not all Muslims abide by &#8220;Sharia law&#8221; and I doubt a majority of U.S. Muslims do.<br />
2. I am not Muslim so keep your ad-homs to yourself.<br />
3. That has absolutely nothing to do with the context of the article which is on American Muslims.<br />
4. If people were &#8216;harmful&#8217; naturally by being associated with a religion, it would be &#8216;Christians&#8217; that should be &#8216;hunted down&#8217; for the Crusades and for keeping the world in the &#8216;Dark Ages&#8217; for centuries.<br />
5. You are mixing burdens and more than that, assuming that if a superior power structure rules for/against something, than it must hold true, which is absolutely not true.<br />
6. There is no space for bigotry on the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomAtStake</title>
		<link>http://prernalal.com/2008/08/american-muslims-not-what-you-think-breaking-from-stereotypes/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomAtStake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prernalal.com/?p=398#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Islam is harmless? Then explain this.

Due to demands from the OIC bloc within the UN Human Rights Council, as of 30 March 2008, the Council has ceded the rights to freedom of expression, as espoused in Article 19 of the 60 year old Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as a matter that is basically &quot;up to the lawmakers of the individual countries to decide&quot;. As of 19 June 2008, the word &quot;Sharia Law&quot; can longer be mentioned during council discussions. (Search the IHEU website for details.)

You want us to accept you? First get your own people to stop mutilating the UDHR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islam is harmless? Then explain this.</p>
<p>Due to demands from the OIC bloc within the UN Human Rights Council, as of 30 March 2008, the Council has ceded the rights to freedom of expression, as espoused in Article 19 of the 60 year old Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as a matter that is basically &#8220;up to the lawmakers of the individual countries to decide&#8221;. As of 19 June 2008, the word &#8220;Sharia Law&#8221; can longer be mentioned during council discussions. (Search the IHEU website for details.)</p>
<p>You want us to accept you? First get your own people to stop mutilating the UDHR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop US Wars &#187; Blog Archive &#187; American Muslims Not What You Think - Breaking from Stereotypes</title>
		<link>http://prernalal.com/2008/08/american-muslims-not-what-you-think-breaking-from-stereotypes/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop US Wars &#187; Blog Archive &#187; American Muslims Not What You Think - Breaking from Stereotypes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prernalal.com/?p=398#comment-894</guid>
		<description>[...] davenoon wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptNone of this tells us how US Muslims feel on the issues or how they may vote in November. Predictably, they disagree with the general public on US Middle East policy: A much smaller percentage of Muslims thinks the wars in Iraq or &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] davenoon wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptNone of this tells us how US Muslims feel on the issues or how they may vote in November. Predictably, they disagree with the general public on US Middle East policy: A much smaller percentage of Muslims thinks the wars in Iraq or &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
