Journal of Peasant Studies – Peasant Pasts: History and Memory in Western India
// September 23rd, 2008 // Desi-Indian, Ethnic Studies, Nationalism, Political Theory
This book review should appear in the upcoming edition of the Journal of Peasant Studies. I cannot publish the whole bit here even though it is my work, since I signed over licensing rights but it should be available through your college databases.
I don’t know whether I will have time for more book reviews in the future or if it is an endeavor that I am any good at, but it was worth experimenting and I am not too displeased with the results. (The Publisher ain’t complaining; why should I)?
Review: Vinayak Chaturvedi, Peasant Pasts: History and Memory in Western India, University of California Press, 2007.
by Prerna Lal
Small excerpt:
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!The untold narrative of peasant classes marginalized from the promise of the postcolonial nation-state is a popular subject of research and criticism among subaltern scholars seeking to pose ruptures and discontinuities in the hegemonic history of Indian nationalism.
In Peasant Pasts: History and Memory in Western India, Chaturvedi embarks on this project after a chance discovery while pouring through archives on the agrarian economy of Gujarat: he discovers notes by the district magistrate about the historically-celebrated Patidars forcibly extracting labor from the Dhalara peasants in Kheda. Upon further investigation, Chaturvedi discovers that the Dharalas were considered a ‘criminal class’ by both the colonialists and Indian nationalists through the passage of the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 and given their treatment, it came as no surprise that the Dharalas opposed Patidar-led nationalist politics along with colonialism.
Enamored by the prospects of an untold history of peasant pasts, the central thesis of this scholarship revolves around the actions, practices and discourses of the Dharala peasants before the emergence of an Indian nation-state. Chaturvedi claims that the Dharalas were political in their own right and their opposition to Patidar nationalism allied with Gandhi did not denote that these peasants lacked an understanding of politics or an inability to imagine political community. On the contrary, through rigorous fieldwork and archival study, Chaturvedi lays out a fragmentary and episodic history of the Dharala peasants that establishes their broad political discourses, complex understandings of political community, and subsequent resistance to both colonialism and nationalism.




Hi,
Can you mail me your email id? (I need it for DesiPundit).
Thanks!
Done. I should put it up actually, thanks!
Ha, Prena! You’re an amazing Queen of Coincidence. Chaturvedi’s book has been on the floor of my office since March. I have not read past the introduction. I read the Intro 3 times.
This winter break, I vow to complete the book. You’re my witness.
Haha! It isn’t too bad. I think he justified writing the book on the claim that 1. Minor acts can lead to transformations and if not so, 2. nothing should be lost to history. What draws me to a lot of subaltern and peasant works from India is that the ’scholar’ actually gets out of her/his office and converses with people. Whether or not they should use the narratives they find to form a larger picture or fit within their own ‘framework’ or narration is of course, debatable. But it is far better than the rigid applications of positivist methodology and/or provincial hegemonic history.