Morons of the Week: Homophobic Religious Leaders in India
// July 5th, 2009 // All things LGBT, Desi-Indian, Moron of the Week
On the heels of the Section 377 repeal in India, some faith-based leaders cannot hold in their hatred and discontent. The Times of India reports:
Leaders of faith across the spectrum are appalled — albeit to varying degrees — by the judgment. While Reverend Dominic Emmanuel, spokesperson of the Delhi Catholic Archdiocese, said the Catholic church has nothing against gays per se, he stressed, ‘‘We strongly believe that sex between same sex partners is immoral, unnatural and unethical.’’
His counterpart in Mumbai, Rev. Tony Charanghat, agreed, saying, ‘‘While homosexuals have to be treated with respect, homosexuality
can’t be equated with heterosexuality. The nature of sex should be complementary to life, which is God’s design.’’In fact, Mumbai’s Catholic Secular Forum (CSF) circulated mass SMSs last week appealing to Catholics to protest against the move to legalize homosexuality. Now, with the verdict in favour of gays, CSF will appeal against the judgment. ‘‘We protest on both, health and religious grounds,’’ says Joseph Dias, CSF general secretary.
‘‘We have statistics to prove that a large number of HIV cases are gay, and this verdict may lead to an AIDS epidemic of sorts,’’ Dias added.
Yoga teacher Swami Ramdev minced no words. ‘‘Do the people behind this verdict consider homosexuality natural? Is it something they will themselves do? If our parents had been gays, would we have been born? Freedom doesn’t mean licence. Our family system is the only ideal we can show to the world. Sadly, this judgment will end up corrupting it. I will be part of every protest against the judgment.’’
Muslim clerics in both Mumbai and Delhi expressed shock. ‘‘India is secular, but most Indians are religious and no religion allows this. If homosexuality is legalised, it will damage our cultural and moral values.“There should be a parliamentary debate and more stringent laws to discourage people to avoid unnatural sex,’’ said Maulana Mehmood Madani, general secretary, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind.
Kamal Farooqui of the Muslim Personal Law Board said, ‘‘We want the government to appeal against the court verdict,’’ he said.
Gyani Gurbachan Singh, head priest of Akal Takht, fumed, ‘‘We oppose this decision. It’s against the law of nature. We appeal to the government to rethink the issue and ask the Sikh community to boycott this verdict, as it is against the teachings of Guru Granth Sahib.’’
Granted that Sikhism is soaked in machismo, I really want to know when and where Guru Granth Nanak opposed homosexuality.
Baba Ramdev, purports to cure ‘homosexuality’ through his yoga. Give it a break. The only thing these people are doing is curing our depressions.
It’s a great day for organized religion though — all the long-warring factions of Hindu, Sikh, Muslim, Christian and Jain are finally reuniting albeit around hating a particular group of people. That’s going to last till the next place of worship is burned down.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!



Yea ..they surely are MORONS !!. There have been several cases in the past to prove that homosexuality did exist in Ancient India a well . So I wonder why the this huge hue and cry now . Infact an overview of temple imagery, sacred narratives and religious scriptures does suggest that homosexual activities – in some form – did exist in ancient India. Though not part of the mainstream, its existence was acknowledged but not approved. There was some degree of tolerance when the act expressed itself in heterosexual terms – when men ‘became women’ in their desire for other men, as the hijra legacy suggests. Why is it that an approval or disapproval of same-sex affection and intercourse dependent on ancient values? Why cant we remind ourselves that the ancient sources that censure homosexual conduct, also institutionalized the caste system and approved the subservience of women.
… wondering how many of those religious leaders have sex with men on the sly while condemning it in public … if the percentage is anything like in the U.S., there’s probably a lot of them, and at least one of those quoted in the article.
You know, the funny part is, after years of fighting over which religion is better etc.. suddenly all religious heads are now united in fighting their common enemy!!
Cheers to the gay community and Naz for achieving this!
Really, are these people naive to believe that homosexuality did not exist in India – even before the law was changed? People will do what they want to do eventually. And the way they are projecting their fears – what if a large percentage of the population turns gay? Whoa.. it is as if a large part of the population is just waiting for the law to legalise it and then get..set..go!
Or as if homosexuals can now run about ‘converting’ heteros to join their tribe! Really how ignorant of scientific facts and reality can they be!!
As for a debate on what is natural and unnatural – In that case, they should be declaring sex between straight couples for recreation (and not procreation) as unnatural, na?
In India, even if a large segment of the population ‘turned’ gay (whatever that means), it might help with birth control!! Of course, even we have babies …