Adventures of a Forced Migrant Contact Me
I’m immensely lucky to have my dear friend, Marisol Ramos, presenting a paper on our behalf at the American Association of Geographers Conference in Los Angeles, California this week..
Marisol and I originally met over Twitter in 2008, when she invited me to the United We Dream convening in Washington D.C. At that time, social media was not widely used by undocumented youth to “come out” and tell their stories, or even to organize. This paper is about the many rich, uneven and multi-varied geographies that undocumented youth have used to create movements for change. And who better to write and present than people who have been involved in bringing about some of the changes.
Undocumented and Unafraid: Re-casting undocumented youth through activist spaces is part of the Paper Session: The Geography of Immigration Policy / Contentious Politics in the Obama Years, A Critical Assessment I
scheduled on Tuesday, 4/9/2013 at 8:00 AM.
Author(s): Marisol Ramos* – University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Prerna Lal – George Washington University Law
Abstract: Since the first introduction of the federal Dream Act in 2001, undocumented youth have organized at the “grassroots” level throughout the U.S. While the “Dream Act” has failed to pass, the federated and statewide legal geographies have become more complex leading to often restrictive political effects. This paper charts multi-dimensional geography of resistance displayed by undocumented youth in the United States, in their quest for immigration status. Over the past decade, undocumented youth have organized locally and nationally by coming out of the shadows, occupying hegemonic spaces such as political offices and detention centers, and taken to social media to not just share their narratives, but also organize a movement. By mapping this geography of resistance, and describing the geographical factors that influence local organizing efforts, we are better able to identify spaces for the empowerment of a disenfranchised population and spaces that allow for intervention in the hegemonic narrative of the nation-state.
I chose to go to law school over finishing a PhD program in Geography. I do not regret it as my work helps so many people, but I’ve certainly missed out on a richer, more intellectual environment that is probably more suitable for my introverted personality.
That’s all I can write for now. It is last week of law school classes and I have five other papers to write before May 1.
All the best Marisol!
Where Am I –
For several decades, racial discourse in both law and politics has arguably been dominated by the call for colorblindness, that we should aspire to “get beyond race” and “see people as people not as skin color.” While liberals and conservatives have differed sharply about whether particular race conscious policies are justified (e.g. affirmative action, magnet schools, minority districting), across the political spectrum, colorblindness has been advanced as the prevailing racial norm around which we should organize. Some contend that we must take account of race on the way to a colorblind ideal; others dispute this trajectory and assert that colorblindness tomorrow can only be achieved by implementing colorblindness now. Still others who eschew normative arguments in favor of empirically based claims argue that eliminating race from public policy decisions actually produces better social decisions. In some instances colorblindness has even become formal state policy through legislative initiatives such as Proposition 209 in California and Proposal 2 in Michigan.
This debate has largely overlooked the particular phenomenon that is at the center of the 2009 CRS Symposium: the persistence of race and racial dynamics in spaces that have been rendered formally colorblind. Notwithstanding the general recognition that context shapes how race is experienced, there has been little attempt to assess how the specific context of formal colorblindness affects the experience of race. Our plan is to do so by convening legal and social science scholars to undertake interdisciplinary examinations of how race functions in environments that are formally colorblind.
I’ll be attending as a member of URPE, the AEA conference in San Francisco from Jan 2 to Jan 5. The following panels are the ones that I am particularly interested in attending:
Jan. 3, 8:00 am
International Migration and Remittances: Innovations in Survey and Experimental Work (O1)
Presiding: DEAN YANG, University of Michigan
DEAN KARLAN, Yale University, and SENDHIL MULLAINATHAN, Harvard University–Remittance Set
Asides: A Field Experiment in Mexico
DEAN YANG, University of Michigan, DIEGO AYCINENA, Francisco Marroquin University, NAVA
ASHRAF, Harvard University, and CLAUDIA MARTINEZ, University of Chile–Remittances and the
Problem of Control: A Field Experiment Among Migrants from El Salvador
MICHAEL CLEMENS, Center for Global Development, and LANT PRITCHETT, Harvard University–
Income per natural: Measuring development as if people mattered more than places
DAVID MCKENZIE, World Bank, and JOHN GIBSON, University of Waikato–Evaluating the Impact of a
New Seasonal Migration Policy in the Pacific
Discussants: JOOST DE LAAT, University of Montreal
LORI BEAMAN, University of California-Berkeley
UNA OSILI, Indiana University
Gero Carletto, World Bank
Jan. 3, 8:00 am
Gender and Migration (F2)
Presiding: FARIDA KHAN, University of Wisconsin-Parkside
MARY C. KING, LEOPOLDO RODRIGUEZ, and CARRIE COBB, Portland State University–Semi-
Formal: Understanding the Institutional Nature of the Labor Market for Mexican Immigrant Workers in the US
LAURA J. TEMPLETON, University of Alberta–The Economic Welfare of University-Educated Immigrant
Women in Canada: Impact of the Domestic Household
ELKE HOLST, DIW Berlin/SOEP and University of Flensburg, ANDREA SCHAEFER, DIW Berlin and
Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, and MECHTHILD SCHROOTEN, University of
Applied Science Bremen and DIW Berlin–Gender, Migration, Remittances: Evidence from Germany
ALEX JULCA, United Nations – International Labour Migration and Reproduction of Inequalities: the Latin American Case
Discussants: FARIDA KHAN, University of Wisconsin-Parkside
ARPITA BANERJEE CHAKRABORTY, University of New Hampshire
Jan. 3, 10:15 am
Sraffa’s Unpublished Papers and Marxian Political Economy (B2)
Presiding: AJIT ZACHARIAS, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College
RICCARDO BELLOFIORE, University of Bergamo–Sraffa, the New Interpretation and Marx: A First
Exploration into a Continent Which is Not Yet Explored
SCOTT CARTER, University of Tulsa–Sraffa-New Interpretation Nexus and the Theory of Exploitation
GARY MONGIOVI, St. John’s University–Sraffa and Wittgenstein on Language and Method
HEINZ KURZ, University of Graz–Ricardo, Marx, and Sraffa
Discussants: PIERANGELO GAREGNANI, Centro Sraffa
JOHN EATWELL, New School for Social Research
CRISTINA MARCUZZO, University of Rome-La Sapienza
After these god-awful, life-stopping exams, I have to get down to several pending journal articles. One of them is for an Australian-based journal called Still. There are several AAG Call for Papers that seem to go with the topic and other half-completed works, so I may attend AAG in Las Vegas again next year.
Q: What kind of potential and current law school students will you find at the American Association of Geographers?
A: The ones doing Marine and Navigation Law
Ok, I admit, that was a bad one.
Call for Papers for the 2009 Association of American Geographers Annual
Meeting, March 22-27, Las Vegas
Craig Jeffrey, University of Washington
Geraldine Pratt, University of British Columbia
We all wait. As Henri Lefebvre argued, waiting is a prominent feature of modern everyday life. In the second half of the twentieth century, in particular, the increasing regimentation and bureaucratization of time in the West, combined with the growing reach of the state created multiple settings – such as bus stands, clinics and offices – in which people were compelled to wait (Moran 2008). Papers in this proposed session might examine these everyday spaces of waiting, including the politics that emerges in places such as the queue (Corbridge 2003). We are also interested in papers that consider the apparent proliferation of contexts in which
people wait for years or whole lifetimes. Of course, there is nothing new about prolonged waiting. But Bayart (2007) has persuasively argued that varied populations are increasingly being forced to live in limbo. Papers in this session might discuss elite, subaltern or middle class experiences of chronic waiting; the causes of prolonged waiting; pathways out of limbo; vernacular conceptualizations of waiting; and spatialized cultural, social and political projects that emerge within communities in wait.
These foci should not be seen as restrictive, and we welcome papers from scholars who approach waiting from other perspectives and contributions from people who had not previously thought of their research in terms of waiting but who are interested in shared discussion around this idea. For example, papers might also investigate how waiting might be theorized within geography and related disciplines (e.g. Bissell 2007), the limits of waiting
as a basis for reflecting on politics and subjectivity formation, historical geographies of waiting, waiting as a methodology, architectures of waiting, or waiting and academic professional practice (Bourdieu 2000).
Please send a title and if possible also a short abstract to Craig Jeffrey at email@example.com by October 4th if you are interested in this topic,
and please forward this message to others who might be interested.
Dr. Craig Jeffrey
Associate Professor in Geography and International Studies
University of Washington
Department of Geography Box 353550
Seattle, WA 98195
11.8 million and waiting, confined in a certain space and territory.
Read More …
The Spaces of Democracy and the Democracy of Space Research Network invites you to:
Ontology, Space & Radical Politics, 4-5 August 2008
August 4th: Radical Politics Today, Community Forum
Long Beach Public Library, 101 Pacific Avenue, Civic Center Plaza, Long
Beach, 90822, 6-8pm
Panelists: Gilda Haas | Strategic Action for a Just Economy, Los Angeles; Laura Pulido | American Studies and Ethnicity, University of Southern California; Goetz Wolff | Harry Bridges Institute, San Pedro & University of California, Los Angeles
Moderator: Jon Pugh| Director, The Spaces of Democracy and the Democracy of Space Network & Geography, Politics and Sociology, University of Newcastle
August 5th: Ontology, Space & Radical Politics, Workshop
Karl Anatol Center, California State University, Long Beach, 9am-430pm
Speakers: Nigel Thrift | Vice-Chancellor, Warwick University; Edward Soja | Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles; Lawrence Berg | Geography,
University of British Columbia; John Paul Jones III | Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona; Sallie Marston | Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona; Keith Woodward | Geography, University of Exeter; Liz Philipose | Women’s Studies, California State University, Long Beach; Mary Thomas | Women’s Studies & Geography, Ohio State University
Moderator: Deborah Thien| Node Director, The Spaces of Democracy and the Democracy of Space Network & Geography, California State University, Long Beach
For further information about these events, or to reserve workshop space, please contact Deborah Thien at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Flyer available in PDF format here:
Please circulate widely, with thanks.